As you may (or may not) have noticed, I’ve been away for quite awhile. At first it was a general apathy: lack of incendiary subject matter plus a belief that no one was really reading this blog anyway.
Then there was a personal setback, namely the dissolution of my relationship with The Geeky Cat. It came as quite a shock to me so there was a certain amount of necessary analytical navel-gazing and rehashing of events in my mind, trying to make sense of the situation and going through the inevitable stages of rebuilding one’s self esteem and eventually, looking to the future toward the signposts of hope.
But I won’t go into detail. Almost everyone has their own experiences in this field and each is unique. All that needs to be said is that I am back with a renewed vigor and hopefully, some subjects of interest.
To wit: Vegansexuals!
The term was coined by Annie Potts (not of TV’s “Designing Women”), the co-director of the New Zealand Centre for Human and Animal Studies at Canterbury University in New Zealand, after she had conducted research on the lives of "cruelty-free consumers". According to Potts, Vegansexuals are people who do not eat any meat or animal products and who choose not to be sexually intimate with non-vegan partners whose bodies, they say, are made up of dead animals.
Apparently, some of the female respondents admitted to being attracted to male carnivores but drew the line at sexual intimacy because their bodies “were made up of animal carcasses”. (When you put it like that it’s not exactly an aphrodisiac…)
Having been in a relationship with a vegetarian, I noticed no such extremes. In fact, it opened my epicurean tastes to a whole new world. But I suppose that with any extreme philosophy, logic doesn’t always walk hand in hand. I mean, whether we adhere to a strict vegan (or vegetarian) diet or not, we’re still animals. And yes, apparently what you eat can (how can I put this delicately) affect the “flavour” of bodily fluids. But I suppose the bottom line is that it all comes down to a matter of personal taste (pun intended).
This also brings to mind other diverse philosophies which may give rise to relationship incompatibility. For instance, I always find it fascinating that people of differing political views see this as a relationship deal-breaker (perhaps more so in the U.S.). There is also the issue of smokers and non-smokers. Can they exist happily in coupled bliss?
Perhaps (if there are actually any of you reading this) you could send me your comments on relationship incompatibilities that you’ve experienced. And if you want to read the article on Vegansexuals, click here.
Wednesday, August 01, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Dealbreaker: One half of the couple works, the other half doesn't have a job.
That can be tense - if the non-working half is contributing nothing else. But for many couples, having a house-partner is a viable scenario.
Yes, that is true, but I am talking about dealbreakers that prevent a relationshp from starting. Not working ranks right up there with smoking, sociopathic tendancies and poor selfesteem
While it's true that being in a state of unemployment may not be conducive to starting a relationship, I'm not sure I would place it in the same box as sociopathic tendencies. (Maybe smoking!) If the person is trying to find employment that is different that sitting idle waiting for the world to come to their door.
Interesting article, have to say that sadly vegans can often be a pain in the arse.
I worked in a vegan cafe and had to constantly tell customers we had no honey for their tea, as honey is an animal product and not to be used in vegan world.
None of us can claim to be consistent in all things, but the funniest vegan I ever met was very strictly vegan and into muscle cars! Hello environmental damage caused by car use therefore damage to animal habitat.
Just saw the photo of Buster, what a sweetheart. RIP big guy.
Post a Comment